MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110606218

Two Sofias’ Choice : catholicism in the fates of Sofia Svechina (1782-1857) and Sofia Rostopchina de Ségur (1799-1874)

2024· other· ru· W7110606218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sofia Svechina i Sofia Rostopchina były XIX-wiecznymi rosyjskimi arystokratkami, które nawróciły się na katolicyzm. Svechina po nawróceniu w 1816 roku wyjechała do Paryża. Prowadziła tam salon, do którego uczęszczali wybitni myśliciele literaccy i religijni. Sofia Rostopchina po przeprowadzce do Paryża w 1817 roku poślubiła Eugène de Ségur. Dopiero w wieku 57 lat zwróciła się ku fikcji i stała się sławną autorką powieści i bajek dla dzieci. Ten artykuł pokazuje, jak wybory religijne Swiechiny i Rostopchiny wpłynęły na ich życie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University)Same topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207