Exploring T2D in the Hispanic Community: Insights from the Rio Grande Valley
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: T2D affects 462 million people worldwide, with Hispanic Americans comprising 17% of those affected. This chronic disease disproportionately impacts the Hispanic population due to genetic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors, leading to severe complications like cardiovascular disease, kidney failure, and cognitive decline. Given the growing prevalence of diabetes in this community, understanding the unique challenges faced by Hispanics is essential. This study investigates factors contributing to T2D among Hispanics to develop more effective and culturally tailored prevention and treatment strategies. Material and Methods: This study was conducted in the Rio Grande Valley (RGV), a region with a significant Hispanic population, focusing on individuals aged 45+. Participants were recruited from Brownsville, Harlingen, and Edinburg, TX. Data on demographics, medical history, lifestyle, cognitive impairment (using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment), and familism variables were collected. Multivariable regression models compared familism and other variables (e.g., sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, cognitive scores) across groups. Factor analysis of 18 familism variables identified key components for further analysis. Saliva samples were collected for genetic studies, and SNP genotyping was performed using the TaqMan assay. Results: Among 333 participants, 81 were diagnosed with T2D. The prevalence of diabetes in the RGV Latino population (42.9%) mirrored CDC reports (45%). Findings showed that T2D patients were more likely to have cognitive impairment (P<0.001). In terms of APOE allele distributions, 11.4% carried the APOE e4 allele, 57.7% carried the e3 allele, and none carried the e2 allele. Principal component analysis revealed a 4-factor model of familism provided the best fit. Notably, factor 4 was negatively associated with diabetes (t=-3.12, P=0.003), indicating high levels of familism correlated with T2D prevention. Conclusion: This study highlights the disproportionate impact of T2D on the Hispanic population in the RGV and explores the association of familism with T2D prevention. Results underscore the importance of cultural values in mitigating diabetes risk. Key factors such as low physical activity, poor dietary habits, high stress, and smoking were significant contributors to T2D prevalence. Culturally tailored interventions focusing on education, stress management, and lifestyle modifications are essential. Community-based programs promoting physical activity,healthy diets, and stress reduction can effectively reduce the burden of diabetes and its complications in this population. Future research should replicate these findings in larger samples, particularly among females and those with lower education levels, to ensure consistent and comprehensive outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".