Temporal Topographies: an analysis of a colonial present
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La tesis presenta un estudio de la fundación ontológica de la temporalidad y la historicidad en el pensamiento filosófico occidental. Realiza una revisión teórica del dominio del tiempo sobre el espacio y argumenta su importancia para la colonialidad mediante el análisis de narrativas temporales en espacios estéticos propios del Canadá colonial contemporánea. A través de la brecha (gap) que Hannah Arendt indicó para pensar entre pasado y futuro, la crítica de Vine Deloria Jr. a la ontología occidental centrada en el tiempo, el “ángel de la historia” de Walter Benjamin y la metafísica de la presencia, esta tesis propone un argumento para instalarse en el espacio de pensar y buscar el lugar de un presente pesado (thick present).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it