MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110644183

WEIGHTED LORENTZ SPACES: SHARP MIXED Ap − A∞ ESTIMATE FOR MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS

2023· article· en· W7110644183 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBIRD (Basque Center for Applied Mathematics) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónAgencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la InnovaciónBasque Center for Applied MathematicsEusko Jaurlaritza
KeywordsLorentz transformationMaximal operatorContext (archaeology)Lorentz spaceMaximal functionUpper and lower bounds
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove the sharp mixed Ap − A∞ weighted estimate for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function in the context of weighted Lorentz spaces, namely 11 ∥M∥ p,q ≲p,q,n [w]p [σ]min(p,q) , L (w) Ap A∞ 1 where σ = w 1−p . Our method is rearrangement free and can also be used to bound similar operators, even in the two-weight setting. We use this to also obtain new quantitative bounds for the strong maximal operator and for M in a dual setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBIRD (Basque Center for Applied Mathematics)Same topicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis ResearchFrench-language works237,207