MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110673035

Official Proceedings of the One Thousand Three Hundred and Eighty-Ninth Meeting of the Board of Trustees, Columbus, Ohio, December 6, 2002

2002· other· en· W7110673035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University) · 2002
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditState (computer science)Presentation (obstetrics)Quarter (Canadian coin)FootballCommission
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This item is the meeting minutes of the Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University held on December 6, 2002 at the Ohio State University Fisher College of Business, Columbus, Ohio. The election of David O. Frantz as Secretary of the Board of Trustees was proposed and resolved. President Karen A. Holbrook discussed the "Update November" and presented an Expression of Support for the football team and coaches. Dr. C. Bradley Moore presented the Presentation on Research - Driver for the Academic Plan. Courtney Howard was presented the Student Recognition Award. The consent agenda included the following: Naming of Learning Center, Naming of Optometry Research Clinic, Amendments to the Rules of the University Faculty, Honorary Degrees, Degrees and Certificates - Autumn Quarter Commencement, Personnel Actions, Resolutions in Memoriam, Report of Research Contracts and Grants, Report on University Development, Employment of Architects/Engineers, Amendment of Alternative Retirement Plan, Establishment of a New Self-Insurance Trust, Annual Audit and Financial Report, and Acceptance of the Report of Audit for 2001-02. The appendices included processes, budgets, building plans, and maps that were not already present in the minutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2420.108

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)French-language works237,207