MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7110703140

Kızılırmak kumunun kayma ve hacimsel birim deformasyon davranışı

2020· dissertation· W7110703140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOedometer testShearing (physics)Shear modulusTriaxial shear testRelative densityOverburden pressureShear stressEffective stressModulus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The response of sandy soils under monotonic loading depends on size, shape and mineralogy of particles, fabric, stress, and density states of mixtures. Researchers around the world have studied their local sands and calibrated their responses (e.g., Toyoura sand-Japan, Ottawa sand-Canada, Sacramento sand-US, Sydney sand-Australia, etc.). However, there are not many studies that have focused on regional sands from Turkey. This research study aims to introduce a local sand, Kızılırmak sand, to literature as a "standard sand" from Turkey. For this purpose, shear and volumetric straining responses of Kızılırmak sand samples were investigated by a series of consolidated undrained monotonic triaxial and oedometer tests. Specimens with relative densities of 35-45-60-75 and 80 %, were prepared by wet tamping method and consolidated under 50 kPa, 100 kPa, 200 kPa and 400 kPa cell pressures, followed by undrained shearing. Test results were presented by four-way plots, which enable the individual variations of axial load, cell pressure, pore water pressure, and axial deformation along with the progress of the stress paths relative to failure envelopes. On the basis of test results, linear and nonlinear elastic-perfectly plastic constitutive modeling parameters, including but not limited to stress and relative-density dependent modulus and effective stress based angles of shearing resistance, were estimated. Due to its angular nature, Kızılırmak sands' angles of shearing resistance values of 35.4˚-42.8° were observed, which are closer to the upper limits of available literature. Triaxial modulus values fall in the range of ~10 and ~160 MPa and are concluded to be in conformance with available literature. Similarly, samples with varying relative densities, prepared by air pluviation method, were tested in a conventional oedometer device under stresses starting from ~17 kPa increasing up to ~33.5 MPa. During tests, unloading and reloading cycles were performed. Based on these test results, particle crushing-induced yield stresses of Kızılırmak sands along with their Cc, C values were estimated as ~2.1-4.0 MPa, ~2×10-3-1×10-2, and ~1×10-5–1×10-3, respectively. It was concluded that Kızılırmak sand exhibited Type B volumetric compression response as defined by Mesri and Vardhanabhuti (2009). Additionally, test results were also assessed within critical state framework. Critical state framework soil parameters of angle of steady state shearing resistances,  and  values were estimated as 39.4˚, 0.070, and 0.975. Initial dividing line, defining the boundary between strain hardening and softening responses, is determined specific for Kızılırmak sand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207