France towards the transatlantic partnership in the second decade of the twenty-first century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
requires a “renovation” in the face of increasing globalization and new security threats. The European \nUnion and the United States, being the natural pillars of a multipolar world, are aware of \nneed to revive the mutual relationship. France as a one of the traditional European powers strongly \ndetermines the shape of transatlantic cooperation. This article attempts to identify the French point \nof view on the transatlantic relationship. French interests and their perceptions in the security area \nare important and needs to be taken into account. So then, how France views transatlantic relations? \nWhat goals France wants to achieve in the context of transatlantic cooperation? Why France is \nnot “easy” partner for the United States? The article focuses on the issue of economic cooperation \nliberalization in the light of the EU - the U.S. free trade agreement (under negotiation) and the political \nand military aspects of cooperation focused around the NATO and the “European Defense” \nconcept.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".