MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7110945257 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15847900

Simulating Human L2/3 Cortical Microcircuit Aging Cellular and Synaptic Mechanisms and Associated EEG Biomarkers

2025· article· en· W7110945257 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStimulus (psychology)ElectroencephalographyHuman brainPython (programming language)Hippocampal formationInformation transmission

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the readme for the model associated with the paper: Guet-McCreight A, Tripathy S, Sibille E, Hay E. Linking age changes in human cortical microcircuits to impaired brain function and EEG biomarkers Network Simulations: Simulation code associated with the L2/3 circuit used throughout the manuscript is in the /Circuit_Simulation/ directory. Note that this circuit model is adapted from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5770999. To run simulations, install all of the necessary python modules (see lfpy_env.yml), compile the mod files within the mod folder, and submit the simulations in parallel (e.g., see job_multirun_loop.sh). In job_multirun_loop.sh, the number at the end of the mpiexec command (see below - 1234) controls the random seed used for both the circuit variance (i.e., connection matrix, synapse placement, etc.) and the stimulus variance (i.e. Ornstein Uhlenbeck noise and stimulus presynaptic spike train timing). mpiexec -n 400 python circuit.py 1234 Here are some of the different configurations of parameters in circuit.py that we change to look at different conditions and levels of analysis. EEG simulations: tstop = 25000. rec_LFP = True rec_DIPOLES = True stimulate = 0 Brief stimulus simulations: tstop = 4500. rec_LFP = False rec_DIPOLES = False stimulate = 1 Stronger stimulus simulations: tstop = 4500. rec_LFP = False rec_DIPOLES = False stimulate = 2 Aging Parameters: OLDER_NMDA = 0 or 20 # Alters NMDA conductance (enter age in years relative to 50yrs) OLDER_SynLoss = 0 or 20 # Reduces PN2PN connection probability (enter age in years relative to 50yrs) OLDER_Proportion = 0 or 20 # Alters proportions (interneuron loss; enter age in years relative to 50yrs) Analysis and Dose Prediction: All code used for analysis and plotting of the circuit simulation results is found in the /Analysis_and_Plotting/ directory. Creation of subfolders for plots and analysis results may be necessary to run this code. In addition to spike simulation analysis, this folder also includes analysis of EEG power spectra (requires PSD generation by first running Plot_PSD_SavePSD2NPY_nperseg_80000.py) and oscillatory events (requires oscillatory event analysis generation by first running Plot_PSD_OEvents_thresh4.py).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→