Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div> Objectives To determine whether 6 months of combined androgen blockade (CAB) treatment would result in metabolic changes of hippocampus and whether metabolic changes correlate with changes in cognition in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods This is an observational study. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) was used to observe the changes in the ratios of N-acetylaspartate/creatine (NAA/Cr) and choline-containing compounds/creatine (Cho/Cr) on the bilateral hippocampus for the patients before and 6 months after CAB treatment. Cognitive function was also assessed by the Beijing version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BJ) at the above two time points. Additionally, a certain number of matched individuals undergoing physical examination were selected as the control group. Results CAB group comprised 25 patients with advanced PCa completing follow-up, while control group had 22 healthy controls. Prior to CAB, no significant differences existed in MoCA-BJ scores (including sub-scores) or bilateral hippocampal NAA/Cr and Cho/Cr ratios between groups. Six months after CAB, CAB group exhibited marked declines in MoCA-BJ total score, delayed recall, visuospatial/executive, and attention functions, alongside reduced bilateral hippocampal NAA/Cr and elevated left hippocampal Cho/Cr (<i>P</i> < 0.05).The results of multiple linear regression indicate a positive correlation between NAA/Cr in the left hippocampus and MoCA-BJ total score (<i>β</i> = 4.66, <i>P</i> < 0.001), as well as delayed recall function (<i>β</i> = 2.76, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Mediation analysis confirms that testosterone influences the MoCA-BJ total score and delayed recall function by affecting NAA/Cr in the left hippocampus. Conclusions The impact of advanced PCa on cognitive performance could be negligible. However, patients experienced secondary hippocampal injury after CAB, which further led to cognitive dysfunction. </div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.674 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".