MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111118497 · doi:10.5061/dryad.08kprr5cq

Data from: Single cell RNA-seq data of E18 fetal thymocytes from HEB Vav-iCre and Id3-KO mice and their wild type littermate counterparts

2024· dataset· en· W7111118497 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGenomicsUploadWild typeT cellCell cultureType (biology)Code (set theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

γδ T cells that produce IL-17 (γδT17) play essential roles in barrier immunity and autoimmunity, but the gene networks that install their functions are not well understood. To understand how HEB and Id3 regulate γδT17 cell development, we conducted single-cell RNA-sequencing on fetal thymic γδ T cells from Tcf12-deficient (HEB cKO) and Id3 knockout (Id3-KO) E18 embryos. Four datasets were generated. The first two consist of WT and HEB cKO datasets derived from sorted gamma-delta T cells. The second two consist of WT and Id3-KO datasets derived from magnetically enriched for CD4/CD8-negative cells. HEB datasets were generated with 10X Genomics 5' chemistry, and Id3 datasets were generated with 10X Genomics 3' chemistry. Raw sequence files were processed using Cell Ranger to generate matrix files, which have been uploaded here. We also include R-markdown files (RMD) and R-markdown HTML output files to provide code and programs used for the data analysis shown in the associated paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDFrench-language works237,207