Wind tunnel testing of an inclined aeroelastic cable model - Pressure and motion characteristics, Part II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deals with dry cable vibrations in the critical Reynolds number range and the associated wind forcing mechanism. Cable vibrations at high reduced velocities were investigated in the third phase of the experimental campaign at the National Research Council Canada (NRC), in collaboration with the University of Bristol and the University of Stavanger. The study focused on the aeroelastic behaviour of a cable model inclined to the approaching flow at f =60º, 77º and 90º. Both dynamic cable response and surface pressures were recorded simultaneously, in an attempt to bridge the gap between separate data on i) cable aeroelastic response and ii) surface pressures on a fixed cable model, available from two previous test campaigns, see e.g. Cheng et al. (2003) and Larose et al. (2003). This paper presents the main characteristics of the cable vibrations as well as surface pressures throughout the drag crisis range. Further, the interrelation between the simultaneously recorded load and response data is examined, in order to scrutinize the conditions present at the onset of the large response episodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".