Еволюція сімейно-шлюбних відносин у південноукраїнському селі кінця ХІХ - першої чверті ХХ ст.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the article the author characterizes the process of evolution of family relations of the peasants of the South-Ukrainian region under the influence of modernization processes of the end of the 19th - the first quarter of the 20th century. The changes in the family relations of peasants of the end of the 19th and the first quarter of the 20th century can be traced on the base of the involvement of court cases, peasant diaries, statistical data, periodic materials and other historical sources. The author emphasizes that, despite the patriarchal nature of the state and church law, the strength of the marriage gradually began to shake from the second half of the 19th century: formed new models of social behavior of family members that were contrary to the traditionally established norms, for example, pre-marital relations, unregistered marriages, adultery, divorce of one's own accord, family conflict, extramarital children, double marriages, etc. It is explained that the transformation of views on marriage and family caused the searches of the alternative ways of self-realization for rural residents of Southern Ukraine. Revitalization of protest in the inside of peasant families against domestic violence is observed. At the end of the 19th - the first quarter of the 20th century the institution of the peasant family was subjected to transformations, which were associated with significant changes in the public understanding of the role and place of the family in the system of administrative and legal structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".