MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111462096

Deep learning assessment of inflammation in axial spondylarthritis and quantitative analysis of myelin water in multiple sclerosis

2024· other· en· W7111462096 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingIntraclass correlationMultiple sclerosisAxial spondyloarthritisDeep brain stimulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable tool for diagnosing inflammatory diseases, such as axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and multiple sclerosis (MS). However, interpreting certain types of MRI images, such as short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) scans for SpA and MS, respectively, presents challenges due to the need for experienced physicians and the low reliability between different readers. To address these limitations, this thesis aims to explore the use of deep learning in axial SpA and assess the feasibility of applying multiple inversion recovery (mIR) magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) in MS. These efforts have the potential to improve the accuracy and reliability of MRI interpretation in disease related conditions. The text below outlines several vital studies on applying deep learning or innovative MR techniques in medical imaging for conditions, including SpA and MS. In the first study, a deep learning model was trained using a dataset of 389 participants' sacroiliitis MRIs. The deep learning model exhibited improved performance through “fake-color” imaging, as indicated by satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value at various evaluation levels. A deep learning-based scoring pipeline was developed using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada system, integrating various deep learning models, including the one from the first study. The high intraclass correlation coefficient values suggested a strong consistency between human readers and the deep learning-based scoring pipeline. In addition to sacroiliitis, the feasibility of a deep learning model in spinal MRI was investigated using STIR MRIs from 247 participants. The findings indicated that the deep learning model's sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value at the image and scan levels were comparable to those of a general radiologist. These experiments demonstrated the potential of deep learning in managing SpA. The final study focused on applying mIR MRF with multicompartment analysis to assess myelin water, a biomarker of myelin, in MS patients. Statistical analysis highlighted significant differences (P-value < 0.01) between healthy controls and MS patients, demonstrating that the myelin water fraction (MWF) could provide valuable insights about demyelination. Notably, MWF was able to detect all MS lesions in the white matter, including those that were previously invisible in magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)French-language works237,207