MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111525159

The relation between sarcopenia, physical activity, and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study

2025· other· en· W7111525159 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePadua@thesis (Department of Information Engineering University of Padova) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcopeniaCognitionDigit symbol substitution testMuscle massTimed Up and Go testMuscle strengthHand strengthGrip strengthTrail Making Test
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the prevalence of sarcopenia among community-dwelling older adults in Malaysia and its association with cognitive function and physical activity levels. Community-dwelling older adults aged 60 y and above in high older persons ratio towns were recruited. Sarcopenia was assessed using the Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI), handgrip strength (HGS), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS2) criteria. Participants were considered sarcopenic if they exhibited low muscle mass and strength/performance. Participants with all three low muscle mass, strength and performance criteria have severe sarcopenia while those with sufficient muscle mass but low strength or performance have possible sarcopenia. Cognitive function was assessed using the 1) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to screen for mild cognitive impairment, 2) Trail Making Test (TMT-A and TMT-B) to evaluate cognitive processing speed and flexibility, and 3) Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) to assess information processing ability. Physical activity (PA) levels were measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) that categorised PA levels as sedentary, light, and moderate-to-high. Statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.3.0. From the 831 participants screened, a total of 677 older adults (average age 68.2 ± 6.0 y, 61.3% women) were classified as no sarcopenia (n=58, 8.6%), possible sarcopenia (n=576, 85%), sarcopenia (n=25, 3.7%) and severe sarcopenia (n=18, 2.7%). Results showed that a higher proportion of women, 5.8% (n=24) were sarcopenic compared to men, n=1 (0.4%). Overall, sarcopenic and severe sarcopenia men and women were shorter in stature and have smaller arm and calf circumferences compared to those with no or possible sarcopenia. Most sarcopenic men and women have normal HGS but outcomes for the 4-m gait speed was poor (<0.9 m/s). About 54% participants engaged in moderate-to-high levels of PA, but PA levels declined with increasing sarcopenia severity. Correlation analysis showed that age, gender, and nutritional status were significantly associated with sarcopenia (p<0.05), but not PA levels. Regression findings showed that age, gender, nutritional status, PA levels, and cognitive function collectively influenced sarcopenia risk (R² = 0.54). These findings indicate the need for early intervention through exercise programs, balanced nutrition, and continuous healthcare support to reduce the risk of sarcopenia and cognitive decline in older Malaysian adults. (370 words)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePadua@thesis (Department of Information Engineering University of Padova)French-language works237,207