MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111560857

Beyond Cardiometabolic: Health Disorders Risk in Metabolically Healthy Obese Children – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 19,119 Children

2025· article· en· W7111560857 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObesityObservational studyChildhood obesityPublic healthMEDLINEChild healthSubgroup analysisNorth west
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Richard Christophorus Kurniawan,1,* Frederick Suhamdy,1,* Muhammad Makarimal Akhlaq,1 Eko Fuji Ariyanto2,3 1Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, 45363, Indonesia; 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, 45363, Indonesia; 3Study Center for Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, 40161, Indonesia*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Richard Christophorus Kurniawan, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, 45363, Indonesia, Email richard24002@mail.unpad.ac.idBackground and Objectives: Childhood obesity is associated with both short-term and long-term health complications, yet a new obesity phenotype called metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) has emerged. While MHO is often perceived as a “benign” form of obesity, research specifically examining health disorders risks in children with MHO remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate health disorders in children with MHO.Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect) for observational studies examining MHO children aged 0– 18 years. The studies were analyzed using R and R Studio software, with study quality assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.Results: Ten studies with a total of 19,119 children were included in this review. Children with MHO demonstrated significantly higher overall health disorders risk compared to MHNW children (pooled OR 2.88, 95% CI [1.64; 5.06]). This trend aligns with the subgroups analysis of left ventricle hypertrophy, hypertension, and kidney damage. However, some of the subgroup analyses showed insignificant results. Additionally, MHO children showed lower risks of experiencing health disorders compared to MUO children (pooled OR 0.56, 95% CI [0.23; 1.34]). The underlying mechanism of the increased health risk is excess adipokines causing systemic inflammation and leading to increased various health risks.Conclusion: Despite metabolically “healthy” status, children with MHO remain at increased risk for health disorders compared to normal-weight peers. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first one discussing the health disorders in children with MHO. More studies are required in the future to reinforce these findings in order to produce much more comprehensive insights.Keywords: children, disorders, metabolically healthy obesity, obesity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.020
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)Same topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207