MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7111633574

Network-based Computational Frameworks for Multi-omics Integration and Genome-wide Epistasis Detection in Complex Disease

2025· dissertation· en· W7111633574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpistasisPairwise comparisonScalabilityComplex networkBenchmark (surveying)Biological networkComputational modelSNPGenomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in high-throughput technologies have enabled the generation of large-scale, high-dimensional genomic datasets, creating new opportunities to investigate the molecular basis of complex traits and diseases. In parallel, developments in computer science and applied mathematics have driven the adoption of machine learning methods, ranging from statistical models to network-based algorithms, within systems biology. However, existing approaches often face limitations, including reliance on restrictive biological assumptions, computational inefficiencies, and limited scalability. This thesis develops and customizes novel network-based frameworks to address key challenges in systems genetics, with a particular focus on multi-omics data integration and genome-wide epistatic interaction analysis. The proposed methods integrate topological network modeling, dynamic data fusion, GPU-accelerated computation, heterogeneous computing architectures, and adaptations of unsupervised learning algorithms, combined with biological validation using both publicly available resources and data from the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) cohort. A central contribution is the Epistatic SNP Network Analysis (ESNA) framework, an efficient, scalable method for detecting higher-order SNP interactions across the genome. Unlike conventional epistasis approaches restricted to pairwise interactions or predefined genomic regions, ESNA employs a parallelized, scale-free network construction algorithm to identify modules of interacting SNPs from genome-wide data. Applied to the CHILD Cohort Study, ESNA analyzed 775,569 SNPs from 1,899 children and identified 914 network modules, of which nine were significantly associated with recurrent wheeze in early childhood. Notably, seven of these modules were also associated with asthma by age five, with several mapping to genes and pathways previously implicated in airway disease, including immune signaling and nervous system development. Benchmark evaluations demonstrated substantial computational gains over existing network-based epistasis methods, achieving a 48-fold increase in processing speed and a 50% reduction in memory usage. Collectively, this thesis presents integrated computational frameworks for multi-omics integration and epistasis detection, demonstrating their utility through real-world biological applications. These contributions advance the capacity of systems genetics to interpret complex, polygenic architectures underlying human disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→