Adaptations motrices lors de la montée et descente d’un escalier chez les personnes atteintes de lombalgie chronique primaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
groupes pour les variables EMG, tandis que des tests de Shapiro-Wilk ont t raliss pour les variables cinmatiques.Des analyses de corrlation de Spearman ont t effectues entre les variables EMG (RMS et centrode) et les scores des questionnaires biopsychosociaux.Rsultats: Les participants atteints de LCP ont une redistribution spatiale de l'activit musculaire du ct gauche lors des deux phases de la monte, ainsi que pendant la phase d'envol de la descente comparativement au groupe contrle.Une augmentation des amplitudes de l'activit musculaire a t observe de manire bilatrale chez les participants LCP, comparativement au groupe contrle, pour toutes les tches et phases, l'exception de la phase de support de la descente.Aucune diffrence significative de la cinmatique du tronc n'a t observe entre les groupes.Aucune relation significative n'a t trouve entre la distribution de l'activit musculaire et les facteurs psychologiques. Conclusion:Ces rsultats suggrent que les personnes atteintes de LCP prsentent des stratgies neuromusculaires altres lors de la monte et descente d'escalier, une tche fonctionnelle modrment exigeante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".