MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111771501

PRESENTATION AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN AL AMYLOIDOSIS PATIENTS DIAGNOSED IN SASKATCHEWAN: A POPULATION‐BASED COHORT STUDY

2025· article· en· W7111771501 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrong
KeywordsAmyloidosisIncidence (geometry)AL amyloidosisRetrospective cohort studyCohortCohort studyDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AL amyloidosis, a rare and complex systemic disorder characterized by the extracellular accumulation of amyloid fibrils composed of misfolded immunoglobulin light chains, presents significant diagnostic and treatment challenges. Globally, the disease has a reported incidence ranging from 5.1 to 12.8 cases per million person-years. In the U.S., there are annually between 1275 and 3200 new diagnoses, resulting in an incidence of roughly 9 to 14 cases per million person-years. According to the report from the Canada’s Drug Agency (CDA), the annual incidence is 10 per million in Canada. Although AL amyloidosis is most often a systemic disease involving multiple organ systems and tissues, localized disease may be seen that involves a single organ or tissue. Despite significant advances having been made in the understanding of the mechanisms of this disease and in new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, there is limited knowledge about the real-world clinical presentation, treatment outcomes, and experiences of individuals affected by this condition. Currently, there are no published data for AL amyloidosis patients in Saskatchewan. A retrospective chart review of cases diagnosed with AL amyloidosis in Saskatchewan provides an opportunity to address these knowledge gaps. This study aims to bridge this gap by providing details of the presentation, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of these patients. We did a retrospective, population-based cohort study using the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency database (SCA), which showed a total of 43 cases of AL amyloidosis diagnosed in Saskatchewan from 2010 to 2023. The statistical testing was performed after data collection using SPSS (version 27). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative and qualitative variables. For quantitative variables, summary measures were selected based on data distribution: for normally distributed variables, mean ± standard deviation (SD), minimum, and maximum were reported; for skewed variables, median with first (Q1) and third (Q3) quartiles were reported. Qualitative variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated survival rates, with group differences evaluated using the log-rank test. The significance level was set to P-values < 0.05 for the statistical tests to determine meaningful differences between groups. The results of this study showed that the population was predominantly male (67.44%), with females comprising only 32.56% which suggested potential sex-based differences in susceptibility or diagnosis. The mean age at the time of AL amyloidosis diagnosis was 65.12 ± 12.51 years and the mean age of patients was 69.71 ± 12.13 years, which suggested that AL amyloidosis mostly affects older adults. The clinical presentation was variable with many patients having multiorgan symptoms most commonly involving the cardiac and renal systems. The analysis of mortality among patients with AL amyloidosis revealed that 65.12% (28 patients) of the cohort had died, while 35% (15 patients) were alive at the time of evaluation. The treatment patterns identified in this study are representative of the treatment landscape in AL amyloidosis in this province. The treatment patterns showed a heterogeneous, selective approach to the disease. Chemotherapy was used as the most common treatment in 31 patients (72.09%). Surgical excision (2 cases, 4.65%), radiotherapy (5 cases, 11.63%) and bone marrow transplant (3 cases, 6.98%) were rarely employed, which may relate to their more focused use for complications or patient requirements. The most used first line of chemotherapy regimen was CyBorD used in 64.52% of patients. The data also indicated that many patients had evidence of raised immunoglobulin light chains, i.e., abnormal kappa, lambda, and kappa/lambda ratio. The most frequent biopsy site was bone marrow (86.05%), followed by the kidney (46.51%), fat pad (18.60%), gastrointestinal tract (9.30%) and liver (6.98%). The mean survival time was estimated at 5.15 years (median: 3.66 years) for females and 5.90 years (median: 5.39 years) for males. The mean survival was 4.51 years after chemotherapy, 7.72 years after radiotherapy, and 5.17 years after bone marrow transplant. In conclusion, this study provides an important insight into the epidemiological data on AL amyloidosis in Saskatchewan, and it emphasized the need for early diagnosis. The heterogeneity in clinical presentation within our cohort highlights the systemic nature of AL amyloidosis and different responses to the treatment. This information could inform provincial health care policy and facilitate the implementation of tailored best practice guidelines that optimize the diagnosis, treatment, and management of AL amyloidosis with the aim of improving patient outcomes and survival. Further longitudinal studies should be conducted to follow the long-term effectiveness of these existing treatments and the role of new therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207