MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111787858

Inhibitory Effect of Penicillin like Metabolites of Paecilomyces carneus on In vitro Dry Matter Digestibility of Grasses

2025· article· W7111787858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and fungal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaecilomycesRumenPastureGrazingDry matterFlora (microbiology)PenicillinOrganic matter
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insufficient growth of lambs grazed on lowland mires in Ice­land is well documented but not clearly understood (Gudmundsson, 1988). It is also well established world wide that toxic substances which occur on grassland pastures can cause ruminal disorder and retard animal growth (Culvenor, 1987). Such toxins may be inorganic in nature, but more fre­quently, they are organic metabolites, for example fungal toxins either on the topsoil either on or within the plant. In Nova Scotia, Canada, where ill-thrift is common, researches have confirmed an interaction between fungal flora of soils and metabolism of rumen bacteria (Brewer et al., 1979; Liss et al., 1985). A research project was carried out in Iceland to obtain infor­mation of the fungal flora of Icelandic pastures (Brewer et al., 1988). Systematic survey of the soil and herbage fungi of a low­land mire pasture and screening tests against cellulolysis by rumen bacteria was conducted. Out of 91 isolates, 10 inhibited cellulolysis and 9 of these were of the Paecilomyces carneus species known to produce penicillin N (Brewer et al., 1972). The present work is a first step, to examine whether penicillin like metabolites in extract from P. carneus fungi would affect digestibility of herbage from pastures and therefore the per­formance of grazing animals in Iceland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUKnowledge (University of Kentucky)Same topicPlant and fungal interactionsFrench-language works237,207