MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111821998

Meta-grid: Un premier pas vers un framework grid basé sur les agents:In Proceedings of 2ème Conférence Francophone sur les Architectures Logicielles (CAL'08), Mars 2008, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

2008· article· fr· W7111821998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the University of Namur · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGridContext (archaeology)AbstractionWestern europeMars Exploration Program
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vu l'importance et l'ampleur accordée au développement des grilles de calcul (grid), il est nécessaire d'avoir une abstraction adéquate afin de les modéliser. Dans ce but, cet article proposera une plate-forme propice au bon fonctionnement d'un futur framework orienté agents développé au dessus de grids existants. Ce meta-grid, qui est une sorte de grid abstrait représentant et incarnant des grids "idéaux" existants, prendra la forme d'une couche qui sera développée pour faire face aux problèmes dus aux différences existantes entre les grids, et aux détails techniques spécifiques à chacun d'entre eux. L'idée consiste à cacher ces détails derrière un modèle uniforme que nous allons spécifier et modéliser. La création d'une telle plate-forme exemptera le programmeur d'applications grid de se soucier des problèmes spécifiques aux environnements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it