MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111869464

Bessere Arbeit durch Bildung: Beobachtungen in Chile und Uruguay

2024· article· de· W7111869464 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEconstor (Econstor) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Education and Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimitingContext (archaeology)Quality (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Für die Chance auf einen sicheren und gut bezahlten Job sind gute Bildung und Ausbildung zentral. Dieser Zusammenhang lässt sich überall auf der Welt beobachten, und das in zunehmendem Maße. Gesicherte Erkenntnisse dazu gibt es aber vor allem für fortgeschrittene Volkswirtschaften – höchste Zeit, sich in der Forschung auch Ländern des Globalen Südens zuzuwenden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconstor (Econstor)Same topicInnovative Education and Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207