Machine Learning-enabled Decision Support System (ML-DSS) for Asset Condition Monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Condition monitoring (CM) is a critical component of industrial asset maintenance and management, particularly in the manufacturing context. CM identifies significant changes in a piece of machinery’s performance which could be indicative of a developing fault and potentially lead to significant operational cost and even major disruption in manufacturing and production.<br/><br/>Implementation of CM in a typical industrial environment requires support by a system of interconnected software and hardware elements. Traditionally, these systems were developed merely for the specific task of asset health monitoring. However, the digitalisation wave of Industry 4.0 and wider application of artificial intelligence-based (smart) technologies has provided a great opportunity for further development of these systems, thereby making substantial contributions to the efficiency of manufacturing and production.<br/><br/>As a part of a UK Government (InnovateUK)-funded project, an intelligent condition monitoring system (called JANUS) was designed and developed in the research and development (R&D) division of Monition Limited (now RS Group plc) in order to contribute to operational efficiency not only by means of reducing asset downtime via more accurate and on-time prediction of asset health condition but more efficient use of technicians/labour resources. In order to meet these objectives, JANUS used supervised learning-based machine learning (ML) algorithms along with multi-criteria decision-making techniques to develop an ML-enabled decision support system for analysis of asset condition monitoring data.<br/>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".