MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7111905929

Industrial training report: Celestica Kulim, Kedah / Nurkamalia Mohamad Razali

2024· other· en· W7111905929 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Supply chainCorporationPromotion (chess)SustainabilityPoliticsAutomationGeneral partnershipService (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The headquarters of Celestica, a prominent worldwide supplier of advanced manufacturing and supply chain solutions, are located in Toronto, which is at the heart of Canada. In order to translate new ideas into high-quality goods, the firm makes use of cutting-edge technology such as robots and automation. Celestica is able to successfully handle even the most difficult regulatory requirements and efficiently solve unique issues because to its extensive industry experience. Through the reduction of its influence on the environment and the promotion of ethical labor practices, the organization has shown its dedication to sustainability and corporate responsibility. Furthermore, the corporation was confronted with a number of issues, such as swings in trade policy and climate change, both of which have an effect on supply chains and subsequent expenses. The organization keeps attentive to political events and makes use of technology improvements in automation and robotics in order to preserve its competitiveness. Because it has a worldwide presence, the organization is able to successfully streamline supply chains, comply with regional legislation, and service local markets. Last but not least, Celestica places a strong emphasis on providing value-added services and exceptional client experiences in order to mitigate the effects of currency fluctuations and political instability. Increasing efficiency and fostering sustainable growth may be accomplished via the implementation of important methods such as operational optimization, waste reduction programs, staff training, and joint research and development activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2580.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)French-language works237,207