Parceria pesquisador-professor na Didática das ciências humanas e desenvolvimento profissional docente
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article offers reflections on the partnership between researchers and teachers as a privileged space for teacher professional development. It describes a collaborative research project whose main objective was to jointly design an innovative teaching tool for social sciences education in the 3rd year of primary school, linking the sociospatial analysis proposed by the Quebec Education Program with the creation, interpretation, and appreciation of artistic productions. Developed in close collaboration between researchers and primary school teachers, the project began with the sociospatial analysis of the three societies studied at this grade level (Algonquian, Iroquoian, and Inca, around 1500), followed by the composition and professional recording of nine songs highlighting their main characteristics. The organization of study and reflection workshops, combined with the experimentation and validation of the tool by teachers, made it possible to identify avenues for its integration into teaching, while also contributing to teacher training in social sciences education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it