Navegando em águas brasileiras: notas sobre a viagem do francês Pyrard de Laval à colônia brasileira (1610-1611)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of travelers/sailors in American lands after the conquest contributed to the circulation of useful information about the potential of these regions. The natural resources that the new lands had aroused the interest of Europeans in these products targeting the trade. The official (or unofficial) visit of travelers to these lands resulted in records of the conditions of the earth, and their habits of obedience towards the laws enacted by cities to control their colonies. Our purpose in these notes is to identify the narrative of Pyrard de Laval, written in the early seventeenth century, the habits, the customs, the laws, the organization of cities, and finally the social behavior and relations between State and society in the Portuguese colony of America. In this sense, we understand, from the contribution of the author on the exploitation of natural resources and agricultural practices in the vicinity of the Baía de Todos os Santos, licit and illicit relations of this social dynamic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it