Les pratiques entrepreneuriales artistiques comme approche éducative. Trois études de cas collaboratives : de l’espace public aux espaces d’exposition.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette thèse examine les pratiques entrepreneuriales comme une approche artistique éducative, à travers l’analyse de trois projets collaboratifs menés par le collectif Stories of a Near Future (Montréal,Canada). Ancrée dans une posture de praticienne-chercheuse, la recherche explore comment la curation, la narration et l’entrepreneuriat culturel peuvent constituer des méthodes de transmission, d’engagement et de mise en récit dans des contextes situés. Les projets Corps Usés (exposition patrimoniale à Paspébiac, Gaspésie), De Passage (intervention sonore dans l’espace public au canal de Lachine, Montréal) et People Make Places (projet de médiation numérique au Centre PHI, Montréal) sont analysés comme des expériences critiques révélatrices des tensions entre autonomie, temporalité, institution et pédagogie. La recherche propose la notion de repreneuriat pour penser une posture curatoriale fondée sur la reprise. Elle avance également la notion de entrepreneurship as art pour désigner une manière de faire projet où l’acte d’entreprendre devient une pratique artistique à part entière : relationnelle, narrative et collective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".