MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112132821

Elohopean ja muiden hivenaineiden höyrystyminen pyrolysoitaessa hiiltä ja jätepolttoaineita leijupetireaktorissa

2004· other· en· W7112132821 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAaltodoc (Aalto University) · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)Flue gasScrubberTrace elementCoalPyrolysisParticulates
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this thesis was to investigate the release of mercury and other trace elements (As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Tl, V, Zn, Ti and Se) from coal and waste derived fuels during pyrolysis in a bubbling fluidised bed reactor. The release of mercury was of particular interest, as it is the most volatile, difficult to control and causes greatest public health concern of all trace elements. In addition to this, mercury exists in flue gas in three forms: gaseous elemental mercury, gaseous oxidised mercury and particulate bound mercury. It is imperative to know the speciation of mercury in order to address questions concerning mercury emission control, toxicity, mobility, bioaccumulation, and atmospheric fate and transport because each form has different physical, chemical and biological properties. In the theoretical part of this thesis, the sources, health effects, legislation and behaviour of trace elements during thermal processes are introduced, with special focus on mercury. Measurement of trace elements in and their removal from flue gas are also discussed. The focus of the reviewed literature was placed on the most recent studies conducted. In the experimental part of this thesis, the release of mercury and other trace elements from coal, sewage sludge and automotive shredder residue during pyrolysis in a fluidised bed reactor was examined. Mercury emissions were measured by a manual, wet sampling method, Ontario Hydro Method, which has an ASTM standard. Other trace elements were sampled by directing the flue gas flow through a scrubber tank containing of 15 litres of HNO3/H2O2 liquid, of which samples were taken during the test. The compositions of bed sand, fuel and char were also analysed. FTIR gas analyser was used to measure concentrations of about 20 gaseous species in the flue gas. The release of trace elements and the speciation of mercury were evaluated based on the results of these measurements and analyses. According to previous studies, mercury is completely volatilised during combustion and gasification processes and almost completely vaporised during pyrolysis in temperatures below 600 °C. Other trace elements can be released in gaseous form, enriched in fine particles or stay in the bottom ash depending of the characteristics and of the mode of occurrence of the particular trace element. During the experiments, it was noticed that all of the mercury was vaporised from each of the fuels used already at below 320 °C. The behaviour of other trace elements was dependent of the fuel as both vaporisation and enrichment in the char was detected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAaltodoc (Aalto University)French-language works237,207