MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112171568

A Data-Driven Dynamic Process Modelling and Optimisation Framework for Condition Monitoring of a Liquefied Gas Refrigeration Unit in South Pars Petrochemical Processing Plant

2023· article· en· W7112171568 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Condition monitoringPetrochemicalRefrigerationNatural-gas processingProcess controlProcess modeling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A commonly reported issue in the modern maintenance procedures of refrigeration units in gas processing plants is the lack of suitable process control and condition monitoring tools that can properly diagnose the unit faulty behaviours at off-design operations in real-time sense and then deploy necessary self-adjusting measures. Such problems, on the other hand, most often cannot be predicted and/or resolved through available dynamic process simulator packages, which is mainly because of the 'general-purpose' functionality of these packages, beside the constraining assumptions employed in developing their numerical calculations. The present study aims to address a malfunctioning refrigeration unit in the currently operating South Pars (SP) liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) plant by putting forward a data-driven condition monitoring framework that is able to effectively predict and resolve real-time faulty behaviour of the unit through customising its dynamic process simulators – based on the actual history of operation provided by the unit embedded measurement tools – and then coupling the output of the simulators to the plant central control unit for planned optimisation purposes. Given the high level of adaptivity of the proposed framework, it can ultimately be utilised as a complementary means for improving the condition monitoring procedures at a broad range of relevant industrial processing plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)Same topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207