Inverse kinematics study of the energy levels of Ne21 populated with the Ne20+d reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: In recent years there has been significant experimental effort aimed at studying the impact of 16 O neutron poisoning on the weak s process in rotating massive stars.Improving the understanding of energy levels in 21 Ne is crucial to reducing uncertainties in the rates of the α-induced reactions on 17 O that determine the overall efficiency of the weak s process.Purpose: This paper reports on one such experiment: a study of the 20 Ne(d, p) 21 Ne reaction in inverse kinematics.Methods: Deduced spin-parity assignments were made based on adiabatic distorted-wave approximation analysis and neutron partial widths were estimated by comparison with a previous experiment.Results: Of particular significance for nuclear astrophysics is the resulting neutron partial width for the 7820-keV energy level, estimated to be 12 200(2900) eV, and an upper limit of 9300 eV for that of the 7749-keV energy level.Conclusions: These results are in tension with previous studies and therefore this paper also discusses the current state of the research into the astrophysically relevant energy levels and highlights both areas of agreement and areas of disagreement between this and various other studies that have investigated this nucleus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".