MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112240020

Entrevista a Manuel Castells: la bretxa educativa és la decisiva en la societat de la informació

2004· article· es· W7112240020 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Humanities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResearch methodologyContext (archaeology)University education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manuel Castells nació en Hellín (Albacete. España) en 1942. Licenciado en Derecho y Economía por la Universidad de Barcelona, cuando cursaba estos estudios, huyó a París debido a su militancia antifranquista. Doctor en Sociología por la Universidad de París, ha sido investigador en el Laboratoire de Sociologie Industrielle (Universidad de París), profesor de la Universidad de París-Nanterre, profesor y consultor de la UNESCO en la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, profesor en el Departamento de Sociología de la Universidad de Montreal, profesor visitante en el Centro de Desarrollo Urbano de la Universidad Católica de Chile y profesor en la Universidad de Wisconsin (EE UU). Durante la década de los setenta ha sido profesor y catedrático de Sociología en la École Pratique de Hautes Études (Sorbonne, París). Actualmente es catedrático de Planificación Regional de la Universidad de California (Berkeley), así como miembro del Instituto de Estudios Internacionales de esta universidad y profesor de la UOC. De su amplia producción bibliográfica destacan los tres volúmenes de La era de la información (Alianza, 1996-2000), obra enciclopédica fundamental para entender nuestro tiempo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)Same topicSocial Sciences and HumanitiesFrench-language works237,207