Lennox Lewis and Black Atlantic Politics:The Hard Sell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the career of heavyweight boxer Lennox Lewis through the lens of Paul Gilroy’s Black Atlantic theory, emphasizing themes such as nationalism, double (or poly) consciousness, Americocentricity, and Black masculinity. McNeil argues that Lewis’s transnational identity—spanning Jamaica, Canada, and Britain—complicates traditional narratives of Black identity and challenges the Americocentric focus of Black Atlantic scholarship. By analyzing media portrayals and public perceptions of Lewis across different national contexts, the article reveals how his image was shaped and constrained by racialized expectations and marketing strategies. Lewis’s ambiguous national affiliations and unflamboyant persona rendered him a difficult figure to commodify within dominant cultural frameworks, particularly in the United States and Britain. McNeil uses Lewis’s career to highlight the Canadian gaps in Gilroy’s work and to critique the limitations of nationalist ideologies in understanding Black diasporic identities. Ultimately, the article calls for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to Black Atlantic politics that accounts for figures like Lewis, whose global presence defies easy categorization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".