MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112345480

The Historical Witness Hub Huang Zunxian and his connection to the Chinese-Canadian community

2024· article· zh· W7112345480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationWitnessHistorical recordComparative historical researchChinese americansNarrativeChinaChinese community
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[[abstract]]晚清詩人黃遵憲(1848-1905),是著名的外交家、政治家與教育家,1882年至1885年7月,他在擔任駐美金山總領事時期,曾經多次前往加拿大的維多利亞市積極地為當地華人的權益發聲,受到華裔社區的尊敬。本文以黃遵憲就任金山總領事期間的相關文獻為基礎,包括清朝宮廷的奏摺、美加當地的新聞報導、留存於加拿大維多利亞中華會館中的書信手稿以及稟文,藉此了解黃遵憲與早期加拿大華人的交流互動,以探討他對於加拿大華人歷史的貢獻以及對後世的影響,並成為見證歷史關鍵的重要樞紐。 Huang Zunxian (1848-1905), a distinguished late Qing dynasty poet, diplomat, politician, and educator, served as the Chinese Consul General in San Francisco from 1882 to July 1885. This study, grounded in official reports, news articles, correspondence manuscripts to the Victoria Chinese Benevolent Association, and related official documents, delves into Huang Zunxian's engagements during his tenure and their implications for early Chinese immigrants in Canada. Actively advocating for the rights of Chinese overseas immigrants and making multiple visits to Victoria, Huang Zunxian garnered profound respect within the Chinese community. Examining the contextual framework, including Huang Zunxian's interactions and influence, this research illuminates his pioneering role in Canadian Chinese history and his enduring impact on subsequent generations. The study underscores Huang Zunxian's significance in contributing to the cultural heritage and development of the Canadian Chinese community. By exploring the intersections between diplomatic initiatives and the experiences of early Chinese immigrants in Canada, this research enriches our understanding of Huang Zunxian's multifaceted contributions, offering valuable insights into this historical period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0310.013
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207