Canadian Industrial Design Patent No. 195351 (Face Shield)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
National Application/Registration : 195351 Date of Registration : 2021-10-21 Made available on : 2021-10-21 Status : Registered Title or finished article: FACE SHIELD Canadian Classification: 29-02-DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT FOR ACCIDENT PREVENTION AND FOR RESCUE, NOT ELSEWHERE SPECIFIED Description: N/A Statement: The design is the features of shape and configuration of the FACE SHIELD shown in the representation. The portions shown in broken lines in FIG. 1 illustrating a human figure show environment and do not form part of the design. The application includes a representation of the design in which: FIG.1 is a perspective view of the FACE SHIELD in accordance with said Industrial Design, shown in use; FIG. 2 is a front view of the FACE SHIELD of FIG. 1; FIG. 3 is a left side view of the FACE SHIELD of FIG. 1; FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the FACE SHIELD of FIG. 1; FIG. 5 is a right side view of the FACE SHIELD of FIG. 1; FIG. 6 is a rear view of the FACE SHIELD of FIG. 1; FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view of the FACE SHIELD of FIG. 1; and FIG. 8 is a front view of the guard portion of the FACE SHIELD shown in an unfolded position UX Design and Research, User Testing, Visualisation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.546 | 0.292 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".