MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112399931

A Landscape Review of Primary Computing:In Initial Teacher Education

2024· article· en· W7112399931 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEdge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Technology in Education
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceTeacher educationTraining (meteorology)Workforce developmentProfessional developmentFurther education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Part 1: An overview of how computing education is provisioned across ITT courses in English primary training providers. Students, staff and school-based workforce contributed data to identify current practice and opportunities for development in this National Centre for Computing Education (NCCE) report. Part 2: How do participants engage with and take up NCCEs training offer within ITT?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)Same topicGender and Technology in EducationFrench-language works237,207