Mogućnost predviđanja pozne inkompatibilnosti kod trešnje analizom peroksidazne aktivnosti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was carried out on one-year old sweet cherry trees of ‘Burlat’, ‘Canada Giant’, ‘Hedelfinger’, ‘Summer Sun’ and ‘Sunburst’ grafted on both ‘Colt’ and ‘Gisela 6’ in order to determine their compatibility. For this purpose, peroxidase (PRX) isoenzyme bands were identified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Samples of inner bark were taken 12 months after grafting from the following three zones: rootstock, grafting union (which included 5 cm above and below grafting union) and central part of the scion. ‘Hybrid’ zymogram of PRX from grafting union having all bands from both graft partners might indicate compatible grafting combination between ‘Summer Sun’ and ‘Colt’. In all the other cultivar/rootstock combinations, some symptoms of incompatibility can be expected. The results showed that peroxidase activity could be used as a parameter in the early determination of possible graft incompatibility in sweet cherry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".