MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112544072

A Comprehensive Study of Wind-Driven Rain (WDR) Loading on Building Facades

2025· other· en· W7112544072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equationsField (mathematics)Atmospheric dispersion modelingCFD in buildingsEmpirical modellingTurbulenceCurrent (fluid)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind-Driven Rain (WDR) loading on building facades is a critical environmental factor. The adverse effects of WDR include material degradation, frost damage, salt efflorescence, and structural failures, requiring accurate WDR assessment methods for sustainable building design. This Ph.D. dissertation provides a comprehensive investigation into WDR loading through a combination of state-of-the-art reviews, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling, ISO semi-empirical model refinements, and Machine Learning (ML)-based approaches. First, a systematic review of WDR studies, summarizing experimental, numerical, and semi-empirical methodologies while highlighting key influencing factors such as meteorological and geometrical parameters, and identifies limitations in current methodologies, particularly the ISO model's performance in urban settings. The second part focuses on CFD modeling of WDR, using OpenFOAM, for a mid-rise residential building in Vancouver, Canada. Four different steady-state RANS models (i.e., standard k-ω, realizable k- ε, RNG k- ε, and standard k- ε) are compared and validated against wind-tunnel and on-site field measurements. The results indicate that the standard k-ω RANS model without incorporating turbulent dispersion provides slightly better performance and is therefore selected for subsequent analyses. Moreover, two WDR modeling techniques (i.e., Lagrangian Particle Tracking (LPT) and Eulerian Multiphase (EM)) are evaluated. Comparative analysis reveals that the RANS-EM provides more accurate predictions with lower computational costs, making it a preferable approach for urban WDR assessment. The third part examines the impact of upstream buildings on WDR by modifying the Obstruction Factor within the ISO model. Significant discrepancies, up to a factor of five, are found between ISO predictions and modeled WDR by CFD. A refined Obstruction Factor is proposed to enhance the model’s accuracy in urban areas. Finally, ML models are applied to further refine the ISO model. A CFD-generated dataset is used to train six different ML models (e.g., Artificial Neural Network (ANN)), resulting in an improved Wall Factor that accounts for a broader range of building geometries and meteorological conditions. Validated against field measurements, achieves up to 53% error reduction compared to the original ISO model. This dissertation contributes to the development of climate-resilient building designs and offers practical improvements for WDR calculation on building facades in urban areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)French-language works237,207