« Vous pouvez me sortir de Parc-Ex, mais vous ne pouvez pas sortir Parc-Ex de moi! » : processus de gentrification et de déplacements de jeunes racisé·e·s dans le quartier Parc-Extension à Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 2019, l'inauguration du campus MIL avec le nouveau pavillon des sciences de l'Université de Montréal a introduit de nouvelles populations étudiantes et professionnelles dans le quartier de Parc-Extension. Ce campus, soutenu par des objectifs de développement urbain et économique de la Ville, visait à créer une centralité à l’échelle de la métropole. Cependant, il a également accéléré la gentrification de Parc-Extension. La littérature portant sur la gentrification explore ce processus comme étant un ensemble de transformations économiques contribuant aux mouvements résidentiels soit et au déplacement de populations locales souvent pauvres et racisées. Le déplacement se vit aussi à travers la transformation émotionnelle, affective et psychologique vis-à-vis l’espace du quartier. Dans ce contexte, ce mémoire se penche sur le vécu de jeunes racisé·e·s de Parc-Extension. Il vise à enrichir nos compréhensions des impacts qu’ont les transformations actuelles sur cette population. Pour comprendre leurs espaces sociaux et les déplacements qu’ils subissent, des parcours commentés ont été réalisés avec les participantes. Cette méthode permet d’aborder leur quotidien, tout en s’intéressant à leurs expériences et pratiques situées dans différents lieux du quartier. Les résultats présentent ainsi des récits relatifs à leurs pratiques spatiales et sociales et aux changements qu’elles subissent. Ils soulignent la complexité des processus de gentrification à travers les changements spatiaux et sociaux de ces jeunes, ainsi que la façon dont ils s’inscrivent dans des processus plus larges de racialisation. In 2019, the inauguration of the MIL campus with the new science complex of the University of Montréal brought new populations of students and professionals to the Parc-Extension neighbourhood. While this campus project was planned to contribute to the city on Montréal’s urban and economic development growth and to foster a broader metropolitan centrality, it also accelerated the gentrification of Parc-Extension. Gentrification literature often frames this process as a series of economic changes that lead to evictions, residential movement, and the displacement of residents who are often poor and racialized. However, displacement is also experienced through the emotional, affective, and psychological transformations of neighbourhood space. In this context, this master project explores the experiences of racialized youth in Parc-Extension, aiming to deepen our understanding of the effects of ongoing neighbourhood transformations on this group. To capture their social spaces and the displacements they experience, guided tours were conducted with the participants. This method allowed for an exploration of their everyday spaces, while focusing on their lived experiences and practices across different parts of the neighbourhood. The results reveal how their spatial and social practices evolve in response to gentrification, illustrating the complexities of these processes and their connection to the broader dynamics of racialization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".