MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112645522

Post-secondary Students' Travel Behavior through the Lens of Urban and Rural Contexts

2025· dissertation· en· W7112645522 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinomial logistic regressionMixed logitDiscrete choiceTravel behaviorMode choiceTravel surveyPreferenceMultinomial probitRevealed preference
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This four-manuscript research investigates the travel behavior of post-secondary students across urban and rural contexts through four interrelated studies. The research addresses gaps in understanding how activity choices, departure time decisions, and active transportation behaviors are shaped by contextual, demographic, and policy factors. Two studies utilize the StudentMoveTO dataset, a detailed activity-travel diary survey from the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA), to model multi-destination trip-based activity type choices and sequential departure time decisions. These models capture interdependencies across multi-destination trips, enabling a more realistic representation of student travel patterns in dense urban environments. The other two studies draw on a custom-designed revealed–stated preference (RP–SP) survey administered to post-secondary students in rural Virginia. This survey incorporates both actual travel behavior and hypothetical choice experiments to assess rural students' mode preferences and the mental health impacts of active transportation under varying infrastructure and service conditions. The research adopted advanced econometric and machine learning approaches to better understand post-secondary students travel behavior. The urban-focused studies employ the dynamic discrete choice models and deep learning architectures Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Transformers to capture sequential decision-making and nonlinear dependencies in activity type and departure time choices. The rural-focused mode choice analysis estimates both RP–SP multinomial logit (MNL) and RP–SP mixed logit models, enabling the combination of actual revealed preference data with stated preference scenarios while also capturing unobserved taste heterogeneity across individuals. The MNL model provides a baseline understanding of average mode choice behavior, whereas the mixed logit model relaxes the independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) assumption and accounts for random variations in preferences influenced by rural context, demographics, and travel conditions. The mental health and active transportation study uses principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction, followed by Random Forest and other interpretable machine learning methods to identify the most influential factors. This combined methodological framework leverages both behavioral realism and predictive accuracy, bridging traditional econometric analysis with modern data-driven approaches. The findings reveal that student travel decisions are strongly influenced by institutional schedules, socio-demographic characteristics, and built environment features, with notable differences between urban and rural contexts. Sequential modeling shows that earlier departure times for initial trips significantly constrain subsequent activity timing, while rural analyses highlight that infrastructure quality and service availability directly affect both mode choice and perceived mental health benefits of active travel. These insights provide valuable evidence for transportation planners and policymakers seeking to design targeted, context-sensitive strategies that enhance mobility options, support student well-being, and promote sustainable transportation in both urban and rural communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech)Same topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207