MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7112681075

L'obbligo delle istituzioni dell'Unione di conformarsi alle pronunce di accertamento dell'illegittimita di propri atti

2024· book-chapter· it· W7112681075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorence Research (University of Florence) · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageit
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLegal and Labor Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsContext (archaeology)European unionIndependence (probability theory)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Introduzione. – 2. L’obbligo delle istituzioni di conformarsi alla sentenza di annullamento. – 3. Portata e limiti della discrezionalità dell’istituzione obbligata quanto alla scelta delle misure necessarie. – 4. (Segue): il contenzioso relativo alla natura e alla quantificazione degli interessi dovuti in caso di rimborso di somme pagate a titolo di sanzioni successivamente annullate o ridotte. – 5. Sull’esistenza di un obbligo per le istituzioni di conformarsi all’accertamento dell’illegittimità compiuto con meccanismi diversi dal ricorso di annullamento. – 6. L’ipotesi di illegittimità tramite una sentenza “interpretativa di rigetto”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it