Addressing Obstetric and Gynecological Violence. Legal Perspectives from Venezuela and Mexico
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstetric and gynecological violence represents one of the most neglected forms of violence against women.Difficult to define by the law, challenging to detect in daily practices, hard to prove and sanction before domestic and supranational Courts.Although violence against women gained increasing legal resonance in the past few decades, obstetric and gynecological violence remains at the periphery of the constitutional and human rights law debate.The book intends to shed light on the intersection among women’s human rights, violence, and reproductive rights, examining how and to what extent women are exposed to human rights violations and abuse in the exercise of their right to private life, sexual health, and reproduction.Interlacing the legal and medical perspectives, the book aims to offer a national, comparative, and supranational analysis while paving the way to legislative mechanisms to effectively tackle obstetric and gynecological violence in the global scenario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it