Radial velocities of AW UMA second component (Rucinski, 2025)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper brings a comparison and rediscussion of the results from Rucinski+2015 (J/AJ/149/49) and Rucinski 2020 (J/AJ/160/104). The observations of AW UMa were obtained on the nights of 2011 March 11-13 using the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) and its Espadons spectrograph (370-1,050nm) working in the spectro-polarimetric mode. The nominal spectral resolving power was R~68000. In total, 584 individual observations of AW UMa were obtained. The exposure times were 90s and the median spacing between observations was 125s. Observations of {epsilon} CrA were made in the service mode with the CHIRON spectrograph (506.5-529.2nm) on the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Small and Moderate Aperture Research Telescope System (CTIO/SMARTS) 1.5m telescope on eight nights between 2018 July 12 and 29. 361 exposures of 450s were taken using the slicer setup, which provides a spectral resolving power of R=80000.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it