Infâncias, famílias e violência sexual: Contribuições da antropologia para pensar categorias as categorias utilizadas nas práticas de intervenção
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Durante las últimas décadas, tanto a nivel nacional como internacional, el problema de las “violencias sexuales” contra las infancias y adolescencias ha ido adquiriendo cada vez más visibilidad en el espacio público. Este artículo busca problematizar las formas a partir de las cuales se recortan y significan tales violencias y cómo a través de estas operaciones se construyen las categorías y los marcos de inteligibilidad disponibles para sentirlas, explicarlas y actuar sobre ellas. A tal fin, articula un análisis sobre la construcción de la categoría de abuso sexual y de su conformación como problema social y cuestión de agenda política en Occidente y un abordaje etnográfico de su tratamiento cotidiano por parte de organismos destinados a la protección de derechos de las infancias y adolescencias en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires entre 2005 y 2009, en el contexto la institucionalización de la causa por los derechos del niño.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".