Competitiveness, regulatory quality and mining-environmental public administration:The Canadian experience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El nuevo plan de acción de la Unión Europea sobre materias primas fundamentales apunta a la diversidad y duración de los procedimientos para obtener los permisos requeridos para la operación de proyectos mineros como una de las razones que previenen avanzar la actividad en el ámbito europeo. Esta contribución revisa algunos problemas comunes de la evolución de la normativa en el sector y de los abordajes ensayados en países de la OCDE para la racionalización normativa o la mejora de la calidad regulatoria (‘better and smart regulation’), aproximándose a la experiencia canadiense en la evolución de la construcción de la institucionalidad minero-ambiental. El análisis se articula con reflexiones acerca de la evolución del derecho de la minería y la necesidad de pensarlo en el contexto de las grandes transformaciones del rol del Estado, el derecho administrativo y la ciencia de la administración.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it