MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7113149024

Structure of the Southern Canadian Rocky Mountain Foreland and Western San Joaquin Basin Fold-and-Thrust Belts

2025· article· en· W7113149024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeland basinSan JoaquinTectonicsStructural basinFold and thrust beltMountain formationFront (military)KinematicsCanyon
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates the geometry and kinematic evolution of fold-and-thrust belts from tectonic to human timescales in the Front Ranges of the Southern Canadian Rocky Mountains and the South-Central San Joaquin Valley of California. Findings advance the field’s capabilities for developing internally consistent 2D and 3D models of both ancient and active fold and thrust belts and have important implications for earthquake hazards in California. In chapter one, we investigate the geometry and kinematic evolution of the Southern Front Ranges of the Canadian Rockies, and orogen that formed over tens of millions of years associated with subduction of the Pacific Plate and accretion of tectonic terrains to western North America. Due to its spectacular field exposures, this mountain belt has long served as a prototypical example of a thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belt. Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered regarding its detailed structure and kinematic evolution. In conjunction with 10 m and 1 m/pixel digital elevation models, high-resolution satellite imagery enables unparalleled quantitative definition of the fold geometry and bedding-fault relationships in the Front Ranges. Using these fundamental quantitative relationships, we develop a series of new, kinematically viable cross sections and 3D models that both reinforce, and in some cases overturn, previous paradigms about this fold and thrust belt. Traditionally, the region is thought to contain a single basal detachment and develop through a break forward sequence of thrusting. Our analysis shows that this fold and thrust belt is underlain by multiple basal detachments and developed through a complex sequence of thrusting that fundamentally controls the map patterns expressed within the Front Ranges. The methods we develop for remote data collection and analysis can be applied to develop and refine interpretations of fold and thrust belts worldwide. Chapters two and three investigate the geometry and seismic hazards associated with Central California's active Southern San Joaquin Fold and Thrust Belt. In Chapter 2, we develop an internally consistent structural model for the system of blind-thrust faults and their overlying, en-echelon anticlines. Portions of these faults generated a series of Mw 5.5-6.5 earthquakes in the 1980s, yet the activity and earthquake potential of along-strike and down dip segments of the system remain uncertain. Our model reveals that the fold changes along strike from a structural wedge to a composite growth fault-bend fold. The wedge locally consumes much of the slip on the underlying blind thrust fault, whereas the fault-bend folds send slip eastward into the basin on an upper detachment surface. Consistent with this, we observe distinct variations in the eastern extent of deformation in the basin. Specifically, slip into the basin on the upper detachment is manifest in both fault-related folds and additional thrust ramps. To the west and at depth, these fault segments sole to two primary basal detachment levels that extend beneath the Temblor Ranges. In chapter three, we couple the structural model from chapter two with groundwater wells to determine the activity of various segments of the Southern San Joaquin Fold and Thrust Belt. We find that sediments of late Pleistocene age are folded through active axial surfaces above each of the major blind-thrust segments. Our observation indicates that the entire system of ramps and detachments in this fold and thrust belt are active. Based on the size of the fault system, it is capable of generating Mw ≈7.7 earthquakes. We additionally identify new active thrust faults in the basin that have the potential to generate damaging earthquakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)→Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→