Доброчесність як принцип державної служби: концептуальний та правовий аналіз
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the problem of integrity as a fundamental principle of public service in Ukraine. The authors note that amid contemporary transformations and European integration aspirations, integrity extends beyond purely legal norms and becomes the foundation for transparent and accountable public administration. The purpose of the study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of integrity as an ethical and legal principle, and to substantiate ways for its improvement, taking into account international experience. The main body of the article reveals the multifaceted nature of the concept of «integrity,» which includes not only compliance with legislation but also internal moral convictions and a responsible attitude toward official duties. At the regulatory level, the principle of integrity is enshrined in the Laws of Ukraine «On Public Service» and «On Prevention of Corruption.» Detailed rules of conduct are set forth in the General Rules of Ethical Conduct for Public Servants, which emphasize impartiality, avoidance of conflicts of interest, and the prohibition of using one’s official position for personal gain. Departmental codes of ethics, such as the Code of the Ministry of Finance, further elaborate on this principle. By analyzing international experience, the authors refer to the practices of Canada, France, and the Netherlands. These countries have specialized institutions (e.g., the Ethics Commissioner and the High Authority for the Transparency of Public Life) that ensure compliance with ethical norms and conduct investigations. Based on this experience, as well as proposals from Ukrainian scholars, the authors propose specific measures for Ukraine. These include: the introduction of ethics commissioners in government bodies; the definition of integrity as a separate legal category; the harmonization of ethical norms across various regulatory acts; and the implementation of mandatory ethics courses and interactive programs for public servants. In the conclusions, the authors summarize that integrity is a key, multifaceted principle of modern public service, combining legal and ethical aspects. They argue that despite legislative achievements, there are gaps that require a comprehensive approach to overcome, including legislative changes, institutional support, and the development of a professional culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".