MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7113326216

Clarifying the Role of Wildfires and Permafrost Thaw in Brownification in a Shallow Boreal Lake Using Paleolimnological Analyses of Diatom Assemblage Change

2025· other· en· W7113326216 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiatomPermafrostPaleolimnologyColored dissolved organic matterSedimentSubfossilBorealThermokarstPeat
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permafrost thaw in discontinuous permafrost peatlands has been linked to enhanced export of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (cDOM) into lakes, reducing water clarity through ‘lake brownification’. In the Dehcho region (Northwest Territories, Canada), diatom (siliceous algae, Class Bacillariophyceae) assemblages in small, shallow lakes have been shown to be structured along a cDOM gradient, indicating that lake brownification can be inferred from subfossil diatoms in lake sediment cores. This thesis presents the results of a diatom-based paleolimnological study of a small, shallow Dehcho lake covering the last ~300 years. Results indicate a shift beginning circa ~1920s from epiphytic and large-sized diatom taxa characteristic of low cDOM lakes (Denticula kuetzingii, Navicula) towards increased abundance of Pseudostaurosira brevistriata and Stauroforma exiguiformis associated with higher cDOM. The timing of this shift coincided with an anomalous sediment geochemical signature potentially indicative of a drought or wildfire that likely initiated an accelerated loss of permafrost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→French-language works237,207→