MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113369787

Probing the Diversity of Fast Radio Bursts with CHIME/FRB

2025· dissertation· W7113369787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasebandRedshiftPipeline (software)Energy (signal processing)Fast radio burstCOSMIC cancer databaseField (mathematics)Luminosity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are extremely bright extragalactic radio transients that flash for microseconds to milliseconds at a time, most never to repeat again. Encoded in every observed FRB is information from burst propagation effects, giving us clues about their mysterious origins as well as the environments they traveled through. With inferred all-sky rates of hundreds per day, FRBs have held great interest for those interested in extreme astrophysical processes as well as those interested in cosmological properties of the Universe. The Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME)/FRB project has revolutionized the FRB field with its field-leading discovery rate. With CHIME/FRB, we can start to carry out population-level studies of FRBs to constrain their origins and inform their use as cosmological probes. I present the first population-level studies of CHIME/FRB-observed FRBs using the CHIME/FRB Catalog 1 data release and the injections system to account for observational biases. I discover that CHIME/FRB is likely observationally biased against bursts originating from turbulent local environments, and constrain the energy and distance distributions of FRBs. I also present the Catalog 1 dataset updated with channelized raw voltage (“baseband”) data (“BaseCat1”), for which I played a pivotal role. The CHIME/FRB baseband localization pipeline can localize FRBs to arcminute-precision as long as the signal is bright enough to trigger the saving of offline baseband data. I then discuss two single source-studies enabled by the baseband localization pipeline — one discovering repeaters during phases of unusually heightened burst activity, and one using the burst properties of an unusual FRB to probe the properties of its sightline. In the latter study, I constrain the electron density content of a diffuse filamentary structure on the outskirts of the Virgo Cluster, demonstrating the power of FRBs as probes of diffuse media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207