MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113386839

The Petition System in the Kingdom of Bavaria – A study on the principles, the political significance and the parliamentary practice with special consideration of relevant parliamentary sources which have been made accessible in/by an EDP-database

2012· dissertation· de· W7113386839 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOnline Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Administration and Political Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKingdomPoliticsLegislationQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Die vorliegende Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit der historischen Genese des Gewohnheitsrechts des Einzelnen, Petitionen an die Obrigkeit bzw. an die Staatsregierung einzureichen. Der besondere Fokus liegt hierbei auf den Zusammenhängen im modernen Bayern. Die Bedeutung des Petitionswesens für die parlamentarische Entwicklung im Königreich Bayern stellt den zentralen Forschunggegenstand dar. Die dieser Studie zugrundeliegende Sichtung umfangreicher Archivalien des Hauptstaatsarchivs München geht einher mit der Auswertung und der kritischen Beleuchtung eines Forschungsprojekts zum vorliegenden Thema, welches an der Universität Würzburg durchgeführt wurde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it