MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113426094

Adapting news video narration to online services

2025· article· en· W7113426094 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia Influence and Health
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativePublic serviceDigital mediaService (business)News mediaPublic broadcastingPublic engagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the motivations, advantages, and challenges of implementing a novel narrative strategy for online news video: the Batman Affective Structure (BAS). The BAS prioritizes emotional engagement as a response to the platformization of news and shifting audience behaviors in digital environments. The model was introduced to three Danish public service organizations – DR, TV 2, and TV 2 Fyn – during a workshop to explore its applicability in newsrooms. Follow-up collaboration with these industry partners examined both its benefits and the tensions it creates within journalistic practice. Findings indicate that public service broadcasters have implemented the BAS to enhance audience engagement and strengthen their presence on streaming platforms. However, the transition also uncovered challenges, such as journalistic resistance to narrative standardization, difficulties in applying the BAS across different news genres, and the evolving role of the studio anchor. The study shows both the strategic potential of the BAS for public service news and the complexities of aligning emotional narrative structures with public service values in a rapidly transforming media environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)Same topicMedia Influence and HealthFrench-language works237,207