Communcation Matters: Mother-Daughter Communication in Breast Cancer Prevention in Taiwan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Open mother-daughter communication may enhance cancer knowledge, awareness, and prevention behaviors among the family members of cancer survivors. In Taiwan, almost one quarter (24.7 %) of all cancer diagnoses among females are attributed to breast cancer. This study, whose maternal participants are Taiwanese breast cancer survivors, investigated the potential influence of mother-daughter cancer communication on their daughters’ cancer prevention awareness, attitudes and behaviors. The research design employed a concurrent quantitative-dominant mixed method design in which both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed at the same time. The qualitative research consisted of seven in-depth interviews with daughters of breast cancer survivors and the quantitative research consisted of a survey of eighty daughters of breast cancer survivors. Results reveal that mother-daughter relationships and their communication were influenced by the mothers’ dependency on and accessibility to their daughters. Additionally, subsequent cancer prevention behaviors by the daughters were significantly influenced by their mothers’ advice. Open communication from Taiwanese mothers with breast cancer is an important means of cancer prevention among their daughters. The Taiwanese government and health professionals should find ways to encourage such communication and make it an integral part of broader cancer control efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".